Survey Shows Auto Insurance Companies Responding to ...

February 5, 2012 (TopWireNews.com: - Automotive, Business, press release)

02/02/2012 // Los Angeles, California, USA // ben@onlineautoinsurance.com // Online Auto Insurance

The results released this week from a J.D. Power survey of thousands of drivers who filed physical damage claims during the previous six months showed that car insurance companies are managing to keep customers relatively satisfied despite a surge of claims and an increase in wait times, according to Online Auto Insurance News.

The marketing information services company announced that the satisfaction levels of consumers who responded to a survey in November and December 2011 were virtually unchanged from the previous survey. But, surprisingly, the average time it took to repair insured vehicles rose from 7.8 days to 8.5 days?a 9 percent increase?during the same period.

J.D. Power regularly polls consumers on satisfaction with various types of interactions with their insurers to gauge public sentiment and to determine who the top rated car insurance providers are. Consumers who are shopping for a policy may want to review the company-specific rankings before making a purchase.

The reason for the increased repair times is said to be a rise in the volume of claims caused by recent weather events that have dealt widespread property damage.

Officials at J.D. Power say insurers were able to maintain their positive marks by keeping policyholders regularly updated on the status of their claims and making sure communication channels were open and accessible.

The officials said consumers who had more communication and updates from their coverage providers were more likely to be satisfied than those who had less communication.

Claims handling tends to be the area where policyholders most commonly find fault with their providers. When consumers are dissatisfied with the process, they should take the issue up with their insurers. But when policyholders and auto insurance companies are unable to resolve their differences, it may be necessary to bring the issue to the attention of state regulators, a directory of which can be found at http://www.usa.gov/directory/stateconsumer/index.shtml

To learn more about this and other coverage issues, you can go to http://www.onlineautoinsurance.com/companies/ratings/ to find informative resource pages and an easy-to-use quote-comparison generator that can help users find the best rates for coverage quickly.

Social Media Tags:Auto Insurance, Auto Insurance Companies, Online Auto Insurance, top rated car insurance, auto insurance

Newsroom powered by Online Press Release Distribution - SubmitMyPressRelease.com

Tags: Auto Insurance, Auto Insurance Companies, Online Auto Insurance, top rated car insurance
Free Online Automotive Newswire Press Release Distribution - TopWireNews.com

Source: http://news.topwirenews.com/2012/02/05/survey-shows-auto-insurance-companies-responding-to-consumers-needs/%25

cincinnati bengals bengals the stand josh mcdaniels cotton bowl wizards of waverly place cedric benson

Real Estate Investing: How Visiting A Discussion Forum Can Help ...

February 5, 2012 at 1:34 pm

For those who are interested in real estate investing, visiting discussion forums is a good way to interact with fellow real estate investors as well as get help with sundry matters related to all things real estate. There is always a moderator there who will help answer whatever queries and questions you may have regarding real estate investing and by using the discussion forum you can place your message that will be read by a wide and interested audience and thus you can be sure of getting some very useful responses as well. Since these forums are free to use, you should not find any excuse not to join one or more of them and express whatever opinions you have as well as also get your doubts cleared up.

Refer To Other Useful Websites

Another useful feature of real estate investing discussion forums is that they allow you to refer others to pertinent websites where relevant information can be found. In addition, you can also get to know of other sites from where you can learn about things related to real estate investing including finding out about tenants and how to double close etc.

Most often, the moderator at real estate investing discussion forums are a professional engaged in the real estate business including brokers and consultants and so you should be able to get expert opinions about all the things you need to learn about with regard to real estate investing. This helps make the discussion forum a very lively place and often you will come across people whose opinions are radically different from yours and these kind of information exchanges are often encouraged, though of course matters must be kept civil at all times.

Of course, real estate investing discussion boards are also very good when it comes to discussing methods of pricing and how to structure commission payments though at the same time the information given must be kept general and thus giving exact commission percentages is frowned upon. If you only want to read posts, you need not register with the real estate investing discussion forum though after registering you can make your own posts and answer posts made by others as well. Often, the whole registration process is simple as well as quick and completely free.

Real estate investing discussion forums are a place where you can discuss just about anything that has to do with real estate and it is equally useful for a small independent contractor and also huge brokerage firms. In fact, if you search for real estate investing discussion forums, you will be surprised at how many separate and independent forums there are to choose from.

Though you are free to post on virtually any subject related to real estate investing there are certain things that the forums do not allow including placing commercial advertisements as well as soliciting business and you won?t be allowed to place for sale ads either. In addition, you cannot place ads for money wanted, partners and mentors and of course using profane, obscene language or making personal attacks is also not allowed.

A good example of real estate investing discussion forums is the one called U.S. Land company which has been around from the year 2001 and has plenty of useful information available for both seasoned as well as beginner investors. It also uses the very best tools to help members expand as well as increase their business and knowledge. It is also a discussion forum that is proud of the fact that it provides high quality services related to real estate investing and the amount of information disseminated is truly amazing.

-

?

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

Source: http://www.cyfcla.com/2012/02/real-estate-investing-how-visiting-a-discussion-forum-can-help-expand-your-business-and-knowledge/

denver vs new england denver broncos vs new england patriots cruise ship sinking vernon davis starship troopers starship troopers nfl

Why Do You Need Venture capital | Inbound Marketing and Sales

Web-based-sales-and-marketing-service

Why Do You Need Venture capital

Article by Cullen Nedrich

It is not easy to venture into the world of business. Starting it up is already a hard task as you need to know where you?d get the capital to put it on the go. You also need funds to expand it for a bigger profit. This is the common problem of aspiring entrepreneurs. However, there has been a formulated solution to this problem. Venture capital would be an aspiring entrepreneur?s assistant in their smallest beginnings.

What is a venture capital? These are loans issues by investors to small businesses and firms to be used a capital for the starting businesses or as funds for the development of small firms. It can also be termed as a business loan since its main purpose of issuance is for business assistance.

For the lenders, this is a high profiting track. Despite the success or failure of the business who issued a business loan from them, the lenders still have the right to place interest on the borrowed amount from them. Also, they become shareholders of the companies/small businesses that applied for a loan from them.

Investors also tend to choose who they will issue a business loan to. Most likely, they would render that is definitely to grow in a time frame of five years. Whether the business has already been established for years or is just starting up, they would choose to assist those that have fast growth in the industry. This is to earn more than just the interest issued on the loan but also to have long-term income from them.

But how long do these investors hold their investment in a certain firm? It usually lasts from three to seven years. The time depends on the development of the firm. If the firm who issued for a business loan is seen to have a quick development, the link between the venture capitalists and the firm will end sooner. However, for those starting firms with a slower development, the link between the two may last longer.

Not only does the venture capital business help other businesses start and grow, it also opens more doors for employment. In the United States alone, the venture capital business contributed 21% to the country?s GDP. 2 million firms would apply for a venture capital every year. These firms they assist would require more workers and result to job opportunities.

Are you in need of Venture Capital? Find out all available source of Business Loans.

About the Author

Often, finding venture capital investors is somewhat easier then finding angel investors. This is primarily due to the fact that venture capital firms hold themselves out as professionals that are looking to invest in small and medium sized companies.

More What Is A Venture Capital Articles

Source: http://virtualblackswanmarketing.com/?p=6792

go ask alice john mccarthy john mccarthy lumpectomy robin williams blaine gabbert netflix stock

[OOC] Incarceron

Forum rules
This forum is for OOC discussion about existing roleplays.

Please post all "Players Wanted" threads in the Roleplayers Wanted forum!

This topic is an Out Of Character part of the roleplay, ?Incarceron?. Anything posted here will also show up there.

Topic Tags:

Forum for completely Out of Character (OOC) discussion, based around whatever is happening In Character (IC). Discuss plans, storylines, and events; Recruit for your roleplaying game, or find a GM for your playergroup.
This is the auto-generated OOC topic for the roleplay "Incarceron"

You may edit this first post as you see fit.

Thundera

Member for 0 years

---

---

Post a reply

RolePlayGateway is a site built by a couple roleplayers who wanted to give a little something back to the roleplay community. The site has no intention of earning any profit, and is paid for out of their own pockets.

If you appreciate what they do, feel free to donate your spare change to help feed them on the weekends. After selecting the amount you want to donate from the menu, you can continue by clicking on PayPal logo.

Who is online

Registered users: 13lazer31, Agent*, Aixulram, Alexander_Right, Aliwa, almostinsane, AmiOfTheRain*, anaka*, Annaky, Antoinetta, aoc0708*, Ashes, AugmentationAudit, austyn101*, Barel*, Beach-Born-Boy, BekaL101, Beta Type Jakuri, birdguard, Blackbird26*, Blackfridayrule, blackwolf, Blademaster_v3*, BleedingLover, BlueWind_22, Bootsie, BoxWithMadMan*, Bromander Shepard*, BSDJoker, Caelus, Calvazara*, candykitten*, cass-isnt-here*, Castella, Celedia, ChaosxChild13, CherryRed, Chiba Tomoe, Choclate~Pyrus*, Chulance*, CountessMomo, CriminalMinds*, Crystal Blood*, DA_SHADOW_PHOENIX, DarknessToDeath23*, Death of a Legend, deathrisesagain, DemiKara*, Demon of Bereavement, Demonoid, dig17*, DivineBitterness*, DragonWriter, drampire, Draruto, dudedude889, Eiris*, Eisenhorn*, EmbracingIllusions, Esana, Eteles*, Everscale*, Exabot [Bot], FinalHope, Firewind, Flume, freakofnature, Fuarie, Gigabot [Bot], girlwt*, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Grimpunker96*, h0gwash, happyface, Hinasil*, Hingyou*, Hitomi-san, Horseygirl*, Hydrall, Ikiros*, Ikuto Tsukiyomi Fan, inara1917*, Inno, iowa90, Irish Wolf, jackrules158*, Jadeling Hawkins, Jamie95, Jayu, Jo_Tunn*, JosephEgner, JynxDaemon, KapugenWolf*, Ken Shiro, Kirai-chan*, Kohananinja*, Konstantein*, KuruLesperance*, Lainpinky131*, LeNarcissus*, Lightning Flash*, Lloyd999*, lostamongtrees*, Lovely ?, LSunday, Lucentfir, Luv-is-a-Bug*, Lux_Disraeli, LycanGod13, maddenbaby, Magix, Makokam, MarchHare, Mat_z6, Me_and_I, Micheal_Roberts, minibear*, Misuteri_Akurei*, Miyokoshi, Movintarget, MSN [Bot], MSNbot Media, mummydove, MuteEcho*, NarrowEye, Nemmy826, Nevermore90, nightwolf, nltniko, Nobu, NorthernSoul, nour06, October*, Panda_lover2195, parallelzero, Patcharoo*, PeTeTe809*, pieluver, Princess Awinita*, PrincessX18, qbsuperstar03*, Qetzo*, QueenJen*, QueenShibby, Quitelovely487, rabble_rouser*, Random Kat*, Rarikou, Rem?us*, rizzyrat, Ropeburn, Saikua*, Sakura_Miriel, Script*, Scythe Massak?r*, Sephula, Setsugie, ShadowWake, Shpleem, silverangel_of_light*, silverenphoenix, SinAngel, Sirius Baren, Sivermist, SkullsandSlippers, SkunkishBlue, Slagburn*, SlightlyInsane, smrtazz13*, Sneakyrio, Something?*, Sorella*, sparkleshine, Sparky1728, spudjohnson, Starryskies*, Steffix*, Steppin' Razor*, Stilts, stormwolf321*, SuperQ19, sweetgal, SylentStand, Sylwyn, Talisman*, The Angry Penguin*, The Illusionist*, The Painkiller*, the_judged*, TheFlag, ThePsycoWarlock, TheRaven&ThePawn, TheSpiritWolf*, ThexTwistedxOne, ThornShadow, Tiko*, TinnaOsp, Tonks, triblade*, Trickster, Tyro*, Uchiha_Itachi, Usui*, utahann, Valerie_Nix, valid posts*, vampyre_smiles, VampyrKidd, varxint, Vestiline, ViceVersus, victim130*, VitaminHeart*, Wake, warthog*, wednesdaysun, Wild1, WindOnFire, wolfoftheage*, XavierDantius32*, Ylanne, Zenia, Zentose*, ZeroTolerance*, zerr0max*, Zukuto*

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/UoR5l4VIvU8/viewtopic.php

bcs standings 2011 rhodes scholarship rhodes scholarship ufc 139 results lee corso lee corso thanksgiving appetizers

Ways to improve your Affiliate Revenue

Published by witter | February 4, 2012 | | 8

The only explanation individuals opt for affiliate internet marketing would be to generate income. The web is considered a great place to produce some further funds and internet affiliate marketing is among the top alternatives that is certainly preferred by an enormous proportion of individuals particularly those who wish to try their hand at offering online.

So, the primary goal right here is always to earn money and also to boost the Affiliate Income as significantly as you possibly can. So the million dollar query is how are you going to improve your earnings from your affiliate programs? What would be the possibilities readily available?

To improve your Affiliate Revenue there are not several alternatives accessible. You?ll be able to only do one of these two points: either improve your on the internet traffic and therefore the amount of product sales or enhance the percentage you get for that sales you produce.

Performing the two at as soon as can double your earnings but each these are simpler mentioned than done.

But improvement is essential in each subject and when you know that that you are doing well using the idea of internet affiliate marketing you will need to continuously have a look at opportunities to improve.

So one of the methods to increase your Affiliate Income is usually to select goods which might be substantial priced or those programs that provide greater percentage than what you are really obtaining. Most people who discover good results in advertising a solution don?t cease there; the much better strategy would be to offer which has a variety of goods at a time so as to cater to a wide number of customers thereby improving your probabilities on converting interested website visitors to clients.

Combining high priced and very low priced goods can assist you to create the best balance.

The moment you?re successful, it?s time to do some research to locate the very best affiliate percentages which are currently being provided.

But just before you leave a plan that is paying, it?s finest to verify how the brand new product functions for you. A greater option is usually to marketplace both the products at once. The subsequent method to improve Affiliate Income is usually to enhance the targeted traffic and hence the conversion charge.

If you are ready to entice greater quantity of site visitors you may find a way to convert some portion of the new visitors therefore enhancing your revenue. For this you need to think of far better advertisement tactics and strive to continuously innovate thus producing your advertizing efforts a lot more effective.

Learn more info on the best Affiliate Tips and also Partner.

Source: http://www.1directory.net/internet-and-businesses-online/ways-to-improve-your-affiliate-revenue-2051.html

narwhals gmail app gmail app phentermine port of oakland grand theft auto 5 grand theft auto 5

Investment Tax Breaks Benefit Retirees

Recently there has been a flurry of outrage concerning the fact that some very wealthy individuals, notably Mitt Romney, pay Federal taxes at the 15% middle class rate, because of a law that put a cap of 15% on taxes on capital gains and qualified investment income. Before jumping on a bandwagon calling for a repeal of the law, people need to understand something of its history and how it operates.

In its initial form the law took effect in 1997, during the Clinton Administration. While the Congress that framed it had a Republican majority, there was no notable opposition from the Democratic side. Part of the rationale was to encourage investment, and in particular to encourage people to sell stagnant investments and reinvest the proceeds in the most actively growing parts of the economy.

In its initial form, the law benefited only the well-to do, as I discovered when I filled out my 1997 income taxes. I had sold some appreciated stock to finance a friend?s mortgage, a move which produced substantial capital gains on paper, but my total income was still in the 15% bracket and I had difficulty paying the taxes since the effective income I had to live on was much less than what I was being taxed on. At that point, the tax structure encouraged reinvestment and portfolio management at upper income levels but still made it difficult for people in the middle.

At some point between 1997 and 2004 the law was modified to give people in the 15% bracket a break on capital gains and investment income as well. The typical person in this category is a retiree liquidating an investment portfolio to maintain a middle-class standard of living. That portfolio is the person?s retirement savings, and while in most cases no real sacrifice was involved in accumulating it, it does represent the sort of prudent financial management society would hopefully like to encourage. Some of the capital gains is simply the result of inflation. People have based their retirement savings strategies in part on the existing tax structure, and don?t have the flexibility the tycoons have to move funds around in anticipation of legislation.

Before using a few conspicuous examples of very wealthy individuals who are favored by the tax system as the rationale for trashing a law that also benefits people in more modest circumstances, I would like to see a breakdown of the numbers of individuals and dollar amounts involved under the current tax structure, and be very certain that either (a) the modifications to the law preserved the tax break for middle-class retirees, or that (b) the people who supported the law were clear that they wanted to saddle this large demographic with an unanticipated and potentially burdensome tax liability. I would also hope that the law was free of the sort of loopholes that would enable the very wealthy, who were allegedly being targeted, to escape a large chunk of the effects.

?

Photo Credit:

?Weishaupt.? ?Flickr Creative Commons. ??Some rights reserved?by?illpig

Recent Martha Sherwood Articles:

Source: http://lifeasahuman.com/2012/current-affairs/politics/capital-gains-tax-breaks-not-just-for-the-rich/

icloud apple update

Cost of 10 leading causes of death to US: $1.1 trillion

By?Baxter B. Allen, 24/7 Wall St.

Last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released its estimated causes of death for 2010. The 10 leading causes of death in the U.S. accounted for 75 percent of the nearly 2.5 million deaths in 2010. Overall costs for the top 10 causes of death topped $1.1 trillion in 2007, the last fully reported year for all causes. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the causes to determine how much they cost and to reflect how efficiently they are being treated.

The overall cost for the top 10 causes of death, which includes direct medical care and the indirect loss of productivity, is far greater when the lost wages of family members are taken into account. Since 2000, the overall cost of the top 10 causes of death has increased by an estimated 35 percent. During this same time, the death rate from these diseases and injuries has decreased by 13.5 percent.

In some of the areas, spending to treat the disease has been very efficient. For example, the costs attributable to heart disease and stroke (two closely related diseases) have declined both due to decreasing deaths and improvements in the efficiency of care.

In other areas, however, costs have gone up disproportionately compared to the decreases in death rate. For example, while the cost to treat diabetes has risen by 30 percent, the death rate dropped by only 11 percent. Of course, when taking lives saved into account, it is tough to decide how much is too much to spend.

Finally, some areas continue to increase in both cost and rate of death. Alzheimer?s disease deaths have increased by more than 50 percent over the past decade, and total costs have more than doubled. This is likely a function of an aging population and very limited success in treatment.

24/7 Wall St.: The 11 most-implanted medical devices in the U.S.

24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 10 leading causes of death to determine how much they cost and how effectively they?re being treated. We used yearly estimates from the CDC to examine changes in death rates between 2000 and 2010. We also examined data from the National Institutes of Health, CDC and several national health organizations focused on individual diseases, to determine the direct costs for medical care and procedures and the indirect cost of death and lost productivity, as well as to reflect how the leading causes of death individually affect the U.S. economy. The costs for each cause of death are based on the last fully reported year for all causes, 2007. More recent estimates on costs were also referenced when available.

These are the 10 leading causes of death and what they cost the American economy.

10. Suicide

• Deaths: 37,793
• Change since 2000: 15 percent increase in death rate
• Total cost: $36 billion

The age-adjusted suicide rate in America has been steadily increasing over the past decade, and the costs associated with successful and unsuccessful suicide attempts continue to rise. In successful suicide attempts, more than 99.6 percent of the costs are due to lost wages and work productivity.?In 2010, the most recent available estimate, suicides cost the economy approximately $34 billion. The overall cost is even higher when all intentionally inflicted self-harm is included. In 2010, there were more than 450,000 injuries in this category, which cost the economy an additional $3 billion in direct medical care costs and $5.1 billion in indirect costs due to lost wages and productivity. The rate of self-inflicted injuries increased by 36 percent since 2000, a greater increase than suicide itself.

24/7 Wall St.: 10 states that can't pay their bills

9. Pneumonia and the flu

• Deaths: 50,003
• Change since 2000: 32 percent decrease in death rate
• Total cost: $40 billion

Despite widespread use of vaccinations, influenza continues to be a major cause of death in the United States. While the death rate due to both pneumonia and flu has fallen by 32 percent over the past decade, the impact of the flu itself varies widely from year to year. In 2000, flu directly accounted for 1,765 of the 65,313 deaths in the category, compared to 494 of 50,003 in 2010. Much of this variation is due to the differing severity of the flu strains each year, as well as the success of the yearly flu vaccine. Until a better flu vaccine is invented, this wide variation is likely to continue. Pneumonia and the flu cost $6 billion in direct medical care and another $34.2 billion in projected lost earnings in 2007, according to the American Lung Association. This represented an increase of nearly 50 percent from 2003, the previously reported year.

8. Renal disease

• Deaths: 50,472
• Change since 2000: 21 percent increase in death rate
• Total cost: $61 billion

Not only do kidney diseases cause an increasing number of deaths every year, their total cost has also been rising at an even faster pace. Dialysis, the process of filtering the blood of a patient with failing kidneys, is an enormously expensive medical procedure. In 2007, direct medical treatments cost the U.S. economy $54 billion.?Between 2000 and 2009, the direct costs of kidney diseases doubled in the Medicare budget, from $12 billion to $24 billion, according to the U.S. Renal Data System. As diabetes and obesity rates continue to rise, the costs of damaged kidneys will continue to skyrocket.

7. Diabetes mellitus

• Deaths: 68,905
• Change since 2000: 11 percent decrease in death rate
• Total cost: $112 billion

Deaths attributable to diabetes have been falling because of increased awareness and treatment of the disease complications. But even as deaths from the disease decline, more and more Americans are diagnosed and the costs of the disease continue to rise. In 2002, the American Diabetes Association estimated that the 12.1 million Americans diagnosed with the disease cost twice as much per person in direct medical expenses compared to otherwise similar people without diabetes. That same year, they estimated $92 billion in direct costs and an additional $40 billion in losses to the U.S. economy. By 2007, there were 17.5 million Americans diagnosed with diabetes. That year, according to the ADA, costs jumped to $116 billion in direct costs and $58 billion in lost wages and productivity, for an inflation-adjusted increase of $21 billion over five years. According to the World Diabetes Foundation, 80 percent of type 2 diabetes, which represents roughly 90 percent of all cases, is preventable by changing eating habits, increasing physical activity, and improving living situations. Unless people start living a healthier lifestyle, this disease will continue to be a major drain on the U.S. economy.

24/7 Wall St.: The 10 most-hated companies in America

6. Alzheimer?s disease

• Deaths: 83,308
• Change since 2000: 50 percent increase in death rate
• Total cost: $70 billion

As of 2011, an estimated 5.4 million Americans are living with Alzheimer?s disease. This number is projected to hit 13.2 million by 2050, according to the Alzheimer?s Association. Alzheimer?s is a very expensive disease with high direct medical costs, as well as lost productivity from patients and unpaid care given by the family and friends. This last category is not counted in government reports as part of the disease?s cost, but was estimated at more than $200 billion in 2010 for over 17 billion hours of unpaid care. As of 2004, total medical costs for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer?s disease were three times the cost of similarly aged people without the disease. From 2005 to 2011, the total direct costs of Alzheimer?s disease increased from $91 billion to $183 billion, according to the Alzheimer?s Association. By 2050, this is projected to increase to $1.1 trillion (in 2011 dollars).

5. Accidents

• Deaths: 118,043
• Change since 2000: 7.6 percent increase in death rate
• Total cost: $308 billion

The rate of accidental injury and death has remained fairly constant over the past decade. It has also remained incredibly expensive. Accidental deaths alone accounted for $91 billion in lost earnings and productivity in 2010. The direct medical costs of all accidental injuries, fatal and nonfatal, accounted for $78 billion. Additional costs due to death, disability and lost productivity accounted for another $233 billion. Despite rather stable costs, accidental death, injury and poisoning account for a greater share of medical spending and indirect losses than all other diseases on the list.

4. Strokes

• Deaths: 129,180
• Change since 2000: 31 percent decrease in death rate
• Total cost: $34 billion

While the total costs of all cardiovascular disease have declined slightly over the past decade, costs attributable to stroke have decreased an impressive inflation-adjusted 46 percent, according to data from the American Heart Association. Direct and indirect costs have both dropped significantly. These declines have been linked to increased awareness and treatment of major risk factors, including high blood pressure, diabetes and smoking, as well as to improvements in acute stroke care, which appears to decrease both death and long-term disability from stroke. Despite these improvements, stroke remains the leading cause of serious long-term disability in the United States.

24/7 Wall St.: Worst product flops of 2011

3. Chronic lung disease (chronic lower respiratory diseases)

• Deaths: 137,789
• Change since 2000: <1 percent increase in death rate
• Total cost: $65 billion

Chronic lung disease is the third leading cause of death in the U.S., but unlike the top two causes of death, heart disease and cancer, it is not seeing any significant improvement in the death rate. The main contributors to this category of disease are asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. As of 2008, there were 23.3 million Americans with asthma, which cost approximately $14.7 billion in direct health care and $5 billion in lost productivity, according to the American Lung Association. Prescription drugs constituted $6.2 billion alone. Another 12.1 million adults have COPD. COPD cost the U.S. economy $42.6 billion in 2007, including $26.7 billion in direct health care expenditures, $8 billion in decreased productivity and $7.9 billion in costs related to death. Smoking remains the number one cause of COPD.

2. Cancer

• Deaths: 573,855
• Change since 2000: 7.5 percent decrease in death rate
• Total cost: $227 billion

In the next five years, cancer is likely to become the number one killer of Americans, if current trends continue. Despite major advances in treatments and increases in the number of people who survive for five years or more, few true ?cures? have been found. Real progress is being made, but there is still a long way to go. Direct costs of medical treatments will continue to rise, more than offsetting any gains due to decreased mortality rates. In 2004, direct medical costs to the U.S. economy were $69.4 billion. By 2007, costs were $104 billion, and by 2020, they are projected to range between $160 billion to $200 billion, according to the American Cancer Society. The vast majority of these increases in cost are driven by new medical treatments, usually highly tailored and difficult-to-manufacture drugs that cost $5,000/month on average. One such drug, Gleevec, increased five-year survival rates to 95 percent (from 70 percent) for one blood cancer and has been used to varying degrees of success in a different cancers since.

1. Heart disease

• Deaths: 595,444
• Change since 2000: 25 percent decrease in death rate
• Total cost: $190 billion

Heart disease remains the number one killer of Americans. But deaths due to the disease have been declining at a rapid rate over the past several decades, despite the ever-increasing issues of obesity and diabetes in America. The indirect costs of heart disease due to death have declined from an inflation-adjusted $114 billion in 2000 to $94.8 billion in 2008. Over the same time period, direct costs of medical interventions and care have decreased from an inflation adjusted $129 billion to $96 billion. These declining costs are likely due to major improvements in care. For example, in 2001, only 43 percent of heart disease patients were counseled on smoking cessation compared to 99 percent in 2010, according to the American Heart Association. Similarly, only 60 percent to 85 percent of patients were discharged from the hospital on all recommended medications in 2001, compared to 92 percent to 99 percent in 2010. Additionally, there was a decrease in the number of bypass surgeries, stent placements, angioplasties and diagnostic cardiac catheterizations between 2002 and 2009, likely contributing to the decrease in direct medical costs. Despite the recent trends, total costs are likely to rise over the next couple decades due to an aging population and increased rates of obesity and diabetes.

Source: http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/18/10183578-11-trillion-what-the-10-leading-causes-of-death-cost-the-economy

oregon football